<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>反讽 on AI内参</title>
    <link>https://www.neican.ai/tags/%E5%8F%8D%E8%AE%BD/</link>
    <description>Recent content in 反讽 on AI内参</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>zh-cn</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 12:10:03 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.neican.ai/tags/%E5%8F%8D%E8%AE%BD/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>每人最多20篇？ICLR新规遭DeepMind大佬“反讽”请愿：这数字也太随意了吧！</title>
      <link>https://www.neican.ai/insights/20iclrdeepmind-20260803121003936-1/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 12:10:03 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.neican.ai/insights/20iclrdeepmind-20260803121003936-1/</guid>
      <description>ICLR 2027 祭出“20篇上限”防论文灌水，却遭 DeepMind 大佬 Dan Roy 反讽请愿：这数字太随意，反正论文和审稿都交给AI了，干脆别限制！表面吐槽，实则揭露学术圈AI“套娃”现象——论文是AI写的，审稿也是AI评的，21%审稿意见被曝AI生成。这场闹剧背后，是顶会面对AI洪水的无奈与反思。</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
